What backlash?
If you're living under a rock, you might be interested to hear that "Dubya" is interested in an amendment to the Constitution codifying marraige as a relationship between members of the opposite sex.
Conservatives (and I use that term loosely) believe that we are heading down a path that will eventually lead to the downfall of this great nation. If we let people do whatever they want with whoever they want, then we're doomed.
But we're not talking about letting any one do any thing. We're talking about adults who love each other and are committed to each other just as I and my wife love each other and are committed to each other. We're talking about allowing individuals of the same sex to commit to each other in a legally binding way that will be recognized by the state and federal governments.
Why is this important? Here's an analogy, my father has worked for the same company for most of his life. While working for that company, my mother has been covered by his health insurance by virtue of the fact that they are married. My father has accrued a modest sum of money for retirement, via his work. If my father passes before that money is spent, my mother will receive the balance by virtue of the fact that they are married.
My parents have been married for 37 years. There are homosexual couples that have been together just as long. Yet, they are not legally married and therefore do not enjoy the same benefits as my parents and married couples who have been married for a single day.
What it really comes down to, in my opinion, is that some folks would cling to some scribblings in a text written approximately 2000 years ago in a completely different language and cultural setting because those texts indicate that homosexuality is immoral, against God and will lead to a nation's demise.
If strong family units are the core of a stable society, then we should be fostering stable, long term relationships between hetero and homosexuals alike.
The same folks who are seeking a Constitutional amendment on this issue, are the same types of folks who believe(d) that the races should not inter-marry.
And as for these so called "conservatives", why is it that they claim to be for smaller government, yet they are constantly interfering in the private matters of people's lives? This doesn't seem like smaller government to me.
I consider myself to be a fiscal conservative and social liberal. I am not a Democrat, nor a Republican. In the last general election, I was a registered Libertarian, but I don't necessarily agree with the party line there either. I believe some matters are too important to leave to the hidden hand of the market, public health issues for example.
And I happen to agree with Bill Mahr, given their track record, the Catholic Church is the last group that should be telling the world anything about sexual matters.