Cultural Relativism
Have you read or heard the story of Amina Lawal? She's a Nigerian woman who was recently spared execution by stoning for comitting adultery.
Reportedly, a dozen states in norther Nigeria have started implementing Shari'ah, or Islamic Law, which gives these states the justification necessary for punishing adulterers by stoning them to death, for punishing theifs by cutting of their hands, etc.
I'm no expert on Islam or any of it's teachings, but I know I don't like the sounds of someone being stoned for committing adultery. Perhaps it's my western up bringing that has tainted my understanding and given me over to a depraved mind.
Then again, this portion of Islamic Law could be barbaric and revolting. Killing someone for committing adultery hardly seems like a fair punishment. Removing someone's hand for stealing something seems a bit extreme as well, not to mention counterproductive.
Obviously, if you compare the rate of recidivism among adulterers who have been stoned to death with the rate of recidivism among adulterers who have not been stoned to death, you'll see how effective stoning really is as a punishment.
Personally, I don't think adultery should be against the law, sure it may be morally wrong and it may wreck families, but against the law? Presumably it was something that took place between consenting adults, if not then it was likely rape, which is a different matter entirely.
Rapists should have their genitals removed. Theifs should have to repay those they stole from for remediation, then they should be punished in such a way that will make them think twice about stealing again and they should be set on a different course -- teach them a useful trade.
If you remove a person's hands, you make it more difficult for that individual to make a positive contribution to society. By removing a theif's hands, you increase the burden placed on society by that individual.
I'm thankful that a higher court intervened in Lawal's case, even if they only did so on a technicality, rather than saying that stoning to death was an inappropriate punishment.
Reportedly, a dozen states in norther Nigeria have started implementing Shari'ah, or Islamic Law, which gives these states the justification necessary for punishing adulterers by stoning them to death, for punishing theifs by cutting of their hands, etc.
I'm no expert on Islam or any of it's teachings, but I know I don't like the sounds of someone being stoned for committing adultery. Perhaps it's my western up bringing that has tainted my understanding and given me over to a depraved mind.
Then again, this portion of Islamic Law could be barbaric and revolting. Killing someone for committing adultery hardly seems like a fair punishment. Removing someone's hand for stealing something seems a bit extreme as well, not to mention counterproductive.
Obviously, if you compare the rate of recidivism among adulterers who have been stoned to death with the rate of recidivism among adulterers who have not been stoned to death, you'll see how effective stoning really is as a punishment.
Personally, I don't think adultery should be against the law, sure it may be morally wrong and it may wreck families, but against the law? Presumably it was something that took place between consenting adults, if not then it was likely rape, which is a different matter entirely.
Rapists should have their genitals removed. Theifs should have to repay those they stole from for remediation, then they should be punished in such a way that will make them think twice about stealing again and they should be set on a different course -- teach them a useful trade.
If you remove a person's hands, you make it more difficult for that individual to make a positive contribution to society. By removing a theif's hands, you increase the burden placed on society by that individual.
I'm thankful that a higher court intervened in Lawal's case, even if they only did so on a technicality, rather than saying that stoning to death was an inappropriate punishment.