Obama, Edwards, Hillary
I remember the Clinton years fondly. I was disappointed when Bush stole the election from Al Gore. I still view the Gore loss as a missed opportunity for America. How different things might have been to have a thoughtful, intellectual and rational person in office instead of the arrogant, stupid and irrational man who currently occupies our highest office.
That said, I'm not a big fan of Hillary. She has always struck me as ill humored. When talking to people I know about Hillary, I often ask them what they think about her "electability" and more often than not the feeling is that she can't draw the independents and moderate Republicans.
Given that, I began thinking over the summer that I hoped Obama would get the nomination over Hillary because just as often, people would tell me that they thought Obama was more electable.
When I heard that Republican strategist and political pukester Karl Rove was on record saying he thought Hillary would be very difficult if not impossible to beat, I immediately suspected it was because Karl was trying to bait Dems into nominating Hillary so they could have a field day with her in the general. I still think that is the case.
Hillary has too much baggage. Obama has so much promise. The Republicans are now saying Obama is even more liberal than Hillary (why is liberal a bad word again?) and that they will be able to turn lots of people against him in the general because of his voting record in Illinois.
I don't know about that and as a liberal myself, I'm sure it wouldn't change my vote, but I do know that Hillary has been high profile and polarizing for a long time. And when she speaks I don't hear the same conviction that I hear from Obama and Edwards, who both speak passionately.
Regardless of who is nominated, anything is going to be better than the last eight years.
That said, I'm not a big fan of Hillary. She has always struck me as ill humored. When talking to people I know about Hillary, I often ask them what they think about her "electability" and more often than not the feeling is that she can't draw the independents and moderate Republicans.
Given that, I began thinking over the summer that I hoped Obama would get the nomination over Hillary because just as often, people would tell me that they thought Obama was more electable.
When I heard that Republican strategist and political pukester Karl Rove was on record saying he thought Hillary would be very difficult if not impossible to beat, I immediately suspected it was because Karl was trying to bait Dems into nominating Hillary so they could have a field day with her in the general. I still think that is the case.
Hillary has too much baggage. Obama has so much promise. The Republicans are now saying Obama is even more liberal than Hillary (why is liberal a bad word again?) and that they will be able to turn lots of people against him in the general because of his voting record in Illinois.
I don't know about that and as a liberal myself, I'm sure it wouldn't change my vote, but I do know that Hillary has been high profile and polarizing for a long time. And when she speaks I don't hear the same conviction that I hear from Obama and Edwards, who both speak passionately.
Regardless of who is nominated, anything is going to be better than the last eight years.


